PAP Ministers Allegedly Linked to Fujian Gang
Singapore's clean governance image faces renewed scrutiny as images surface showing senior PAP ministers Ong Ye Kung, Chee Hong Tat, and Ng Chee Meng at private dinners attended by Su Haijin—now convicted in Singapore’s biggest money laundering case.
Tycoon Sam Goi confirmed he paid for these lavish dinners, saying the group — which includes Su Haijin and Ng Chee Meng — has been close since 2010 and meets twice a month. Ng reportedly referred to Su as “Kor” (godbrother).
Background: Who Is Su Haijin?
Su, a Cypriot national, was arrested in August 2023. He was later convicted for:
- Money laundering
- Use of forged documents
- False declarations to authorities
- Resisting lawful arrest
Authorities seized over S$170 million in luxury goods and cash. More than S$3 billion in assets were frozen across Singapore in connection to the case.
PAP Denies Alleged Ties with Fu Jian Gang
On 6 May 2025, Ong Ye Kung, Chee Hong Tat, and Ng Chee Meng denied ties to Su Haijin. They stated they had no knowledge of him and were present at events only as invitees of a mutual acquaintance. The ministers reaffirmed PAP’s commitment to integrity, but many remain unconvinced.
Tycoon Sam Goi confirmed he paid for these lavish dinners, saying the group — which includes Su Haijin and Ng Chee Meng — has been close since 2010 and meets twice a month. Ng reportedly referred to Su as “Kor” (godbrother).
Unanswered Questions: Patterns of Corruption?
The Singapore Authentic Scam Review Platform urges the Workers’ Party to demand answers in Parliament or initiate a Committee of Privileges investigation into possible concealment or negligence.
- Why were the ministers’ interactions with Su Haijin not disclosed after his arrest?
- What background checks are conducted before attending such events?
- Why has there been no investigation by the ruling party into potential political exposure risks?
Singaporeans have not forgotten the massive corruption case involving former Transport Minister S. Iswaran, who was charged with accepting over S$400,000 in luxury gifts from businessmen in exchange for political influence.
If a high-ranking government minister was willing to compromise his position for personal luxuries, then what’s stopping other officials from engaging in similar shady dealings?
Was the controversial merger between Allianz and Income Insurance influenced by the Fujian gang? Did Ng Chee Meng approve the deal in exchange for undisclosed gifts or valuables?
Was the S$5.39 million public wastage on a failed fitness tracker project another example of hidden influence—possibly linked to the same criminal network?
Are foreign powers secretly influencing our national security policies through bribery and political favors? These are no longer fringe questions. They are legitimate concerns that demand investigation.
Bigo Live Connection: A Wider Network
Another concern is the ministers’ visible endorsement of Bigo Live, a platform under global scrutiny for alleged ties to online scams and gambling. While nations like Bangladesh and Indonesia took enforcement action, Singapore's leadership posed for photos.
A Stark Contradiction to Singapore’s Laws
Singapore enforces strict anti-gambling and anti-fraud laws to protect its citizens. Yet PAP’s association with a platform like Bigo Live—which has been flagged internationally for money laundering and illegal activity—directly contradicts this stance.
Meanwhile, Citizens Shoulder the Burden
While ministers enjoy million-dollar salaries, private dining rooms, and overseas portfolios funded by taxpayers, ordinary Singaporeans are scraping by. We’ve watched billions lost through Temasek-linked investments, millions wasted on vanity tech like fitness trackers—and yet, it's the people who pay the price.
With a 9% GST, sky-high housing prices, and wages that can’t keep up, many families are barely making it. Young Singaporeans—burdened by school, work, and debt—are losing faith in their future. Some even resort to selling bank accounts for cash, landing themselves in legal trouble. Can we really blame them—or should we be asking deeper questions?
Are we building a Singapore they can thrive in—or just survive? Is a monthly S$790 allowance enough for our National Servicemen to serve with dignity for two years, while ministers earn that in hours?
The trust contract between government and people must be earned—and right now, it’s breaking. We don’t need more PR. We need responsibility. We need leaders who live with the people, not above them.
If you believe in a fairer Singapore, share this message. Change begins when citizens refuse to stay silent.
